Tim Bray wrote:
Can I just make sure we're all thinking the same thing? Using James'
example:
POST /myblog/entries HTTP/1.1
Host: example.org
Content- Type: image/png
Title: A picture of the beach
{binary data}
I get back
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:17:11 GMT
Content- Type: application/atom+xml; charset="utf-8"
Content- Location: http://example.org/edit/first-post.atom
Above is an assumption that the entry for the img is pointed to by
Content-Location. This is a SHOULD. What if someone doesn't follow the
specification? More's the point under what circumstances do we think
SHOULD can't be followed?
(I dislike seeing the same thing said in two different places. Equates
to optionality)
<author><name>John Doe</name></author>
Above is magic. Do we need an Author header?
</entry>
Also needs a summary - what to use - the title? Do we need a Summary header?
I'm still -1 on the edit-source thing.
