Tim Bray wrote:
If there were no further discussion: It's hard to see how to avoid adopting this now that IRIs are standards-track RFC. -Tim
I saw some concerns (with which I agree) that requiring the presence of an IDN library is problematic. As far as I can tell, it's likely to be ignored by developers of clients that run on somwehat constrained devices.
Also; I sypmathize with supporting IRI, but that shouldn't mean it needs to replace any usage of URIs (for instance, I also think that the introduction into XMLNS 1.1 was a mistake).
So: -0.
Best regards, Julian
-- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
