David Powell wrote:
> It looks like this might have got lost accidently when the
> atom:head element was introduced. Previously Atom 0.3 said [1]:
>> Ordering of the element children of atom:feed element MUST NOT be
>> considered significant.
+1.
The order of entries in an Atom feed should NOT be significant. This
is, I think, a very, very important point to make.
bob wyman
