* Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-09 22:30]: > What compelling use case would enabling the omission of > non-remote, textual content - i.e., not merely providing a zero > length content, but the outright omission of same - enable?
I have no opinion either way (not that it would have much weight), but Iâm curious to know: why are atom:title and atom:link/@title not sufficient a textual non-remote content? Regards, -- Aristotle
