On 4/25/05, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim Bray wrote:
> > > > I decided it would help if there was an actual Pace: > > http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceOptionalSummary > It doesn't make sense to REQUIRE protocol elements for which there are > valid reasonable use cases where implementations can't supply them and > which aren't absolutely needed for interoperability. This Pace addresses my concerns in full. Robert Sayre