On 4/25/05, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Tim Bray wrote:

> >
> > I decided it would help if there was an actual Pace:
> > http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceOptionalSummary

> It doesn't make sense to REQUIRE protocol elements for which there are
> valid reasonable use cases where implementations can't supply them and
> which aren't absolutely needed for interoperability. 

This Pace addresses my concerns in full.

Robert Sayre

Reply via email to