On 4/26/05, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > she said > "Don't you have anything better to talk about?" I suspect she has a > point.
Welcome to atom-syntax. :) > Suppose we leave it the way it is... people who don't want to > include a summary can use <summary/>, so it's just silly to say that > there's an example of a current feed that would be ruled out. Consider a message from client to server using the Atom Protocol. Do the following messages mean the same thing? <entry>... <id>...</id> <title>...</title> <content/> </entry> <entry>... <id>...</id> <title>...</title> <summary/> </entry> <entry>... <id>...</id> <title>...</title> <content/> <summary/> </entry> I have my thoughts, but the WG hasn't decided. Robert Sayre
