On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, at 05:37 AM, Graham wrote:
Let's forget about Paces for a minute. Does anyone disagree with the principal of recommending publishers include summaries if they have them available, and aren't supplying atom:content?
Yes.
Note that I also recognize the legitimacy of publishing a feed without the summary, even if available, in some circumstances--hopefully in an alternative version of the feed (ie., hopefully there's a version of the feed with summaries or content, and a special-purpose one without). That'd lead to a SHOULD, right?
