On 5/16/05, Bill de h�ra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Only, and this is not a joke, if you agree to add the text "What this > specification doesn't ban, it allows". Let's leave no room for doubt as > to the spirit of interpretation.
"Future versions of this specification could add new elements and attributes to the Atom markup vocabulary. Software written to conform to this version of the specification will not be able to process such markup correctly and, in fact, will not be able to distinguish it from markup error." What error would that be? Robert Sayre
