On 5/21/05, Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21 May 2005, at 2:41 am, Robert Sayre wrote: > > > OK. The chairs' latest text reads: > > > > " If multiple atom:entry elements with the same atom:id value appear > > in an Atom Feed document, they describe the same entry and Atom > > Processors MUST treat them as such." > > > > Where does the bad behavior come in, and what can we do to > > discourage it? > > This line: > "Their atom:updated timestamps SHOULD be different"
Ah. I misread their orders, thinking I was only to include the first sentence. You're 100% right. Note that this does not mean I'm in favor of atom:modified. Versioning problems aren't solved by timestamps. Robert Sayre
