Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 8:24:16 PM, Graham wrote:
> On 24 May 2005, at 7:08 pm, David Powell wrote: >> Whether the draft allowed it or not, atom:link isn't an extension >> point. That would be Section 6.3 style "unknown foreign markup". > Unless there's a memo I missed, extensions are a subset of "unknown > foreign markup". That is what I said isn't it? Some "unknown foreign markup" is an extension. -- Dave
