On 6/17/05, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S. Why is this on atom-sytax? Is there a concrete proposal we are > talking about here? Is there likely to be?
Were you expecting [atom-syntax] to vanish in a puff of smoke once we have a couple RFCs under our belt? Given the technology, and the participants, I would expect [atom-syntax] to have the longevity of [xml-dev]. -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
