On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, at 01:09 PM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-05 19:30]:
Antone Roundy wrote:
"When signing individual entries that do not contain an
atom:source element, be aware that aggregators inserting an
atom:source element will be unable to retain the signature. For this
reason, publishers might consider including an atom:source element in
all individually signed entries."
+1
+1 as well. It is one of those obvious-in-hindsight things that
the spec would do well to point out to implementors in advance.
If putting this into the spec would require a delay, then I
suppose we’ll have to end up living with a spec that could have
been more explicit. This clarification is not worth slowing
things down for.
Agreed. If we can get it in without delaying things, I'm all for it.
But if not, then I can live without it. It doesn't actually change
anything--just reduces the probability of the issue being overlooked.
