On 21 Jul 2005, at 7:29 pm, James Cerra wrote:

Graham,


Yes, but your proposed solution just requires people at the other end
of the chain to do the hard work. A common theme in the design of
Atom is minimizing the amount of work that must be done by publishers
(of which there are many) vs the amount of work done by processing
tools (of which there are few, and which are easier to turn into
common libraries).


You are probably correct.  However...

Aren't HTML's character references harder for publishing software to produce compared with HTML numeric references? After all, producing numeric references requires a simple fast algorithm and no lookup table. Thus, depreciating HTML
character references makes it _easier_ to publish Atom code as well.

Not if the HTML in the publishers database already contains named references, and/or users are regularly submitting HTML that contains named references.

The only feed producer software that probably likes HTML character references above all else are human hands. And if humans are writing their feeds by hand,
then.

Feeds a generally a small facet of a much larger publishing system or process, that yes, includes humans.

Graham

Reply via email to