Sunday, July 31, 2005, 1:09:44 AM, I wrote:
> I don't believe that atom:link _isn't_ usefully extensible other than by er, that should be "is" -- Dave
Sunday, July 31, 2005, 1:09:44 AM, I wrote:
> I don't believe that atom:link _isn't_ usefully extensible other than by er, that should be "is" -- Dave