Sunday, July 31, 2005, 4:19:40 PM, you wrote:
> I see, thanks for the clarification. > (I guess atom never intended to allow free -as in speech *and* in > beer- data mixing anyway, but another namespace would perhaps have > facilitated the inclusion of atom data in existing rdf tools.) I would recommend shifting Atom into a separate AtomRDF namespace if you want to use it with RDF tools. You'll probably need to anyway to disambiguate things in Atom that are context sensitive, eg link/@type vs title/@type. Actually this raises an issue with my Atom/RDF model. I currently convert Simple Extension Elements to RDF properties, but I probably need to create another triple to preserve the namespace URI of the property - eg: _:entry <http://example.comlattitude> "53" <http://example.comlattitude> ns:namespaceURI <http://example.com> otherwise, it won't be possible to round-trip properties. -- Dave
