* Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-21 21:55]: > Ah, I had missed that. This leads to a question for the mailing > list. Does an informative extension that appears at the feed > level (as compared to in entries) indicate: > > a) this information pertains to each entry > > b) this information pertains to the feed itself > > c) this information pertains to each entry and to the feed > itself > > d) completely unknown unless specified in the extension > definition
Atom itself has precedent for both b) and c). So I would say it’s d) – but also that aggregators should assume b) when they don’t know any better. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
