On Aug 21, 2005, at 1:42 PM, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-21 21:55]:
Ah, I had missed that. This leads to a question for the mailing
list. Does an informative extension that appears at the feed
level (as compared to in entries) indicate:
d) completely unknown unless specified in the extension
definition
Atom itself has precedent for both b) and c). So I would say
it’s d) – but also that aggregators should assume b) when they
don’t know any better.
Right, the only possible answer. -Tim
