Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Hoffman asked: > > Does an informative extension that appears at the feed level > > (as compared to in entries) indicate: > > a) this information pertains to each entry > > b) this information pertains to the feed itself > > c) this information pertains to each entry and to the feed itself > > d) completely unknown unless specified in the extension definition > > I believe the correct answer is "e": > > e) Unless otherwise specified, this information pertains to the feed only.
I agree. Once you've accepted that there's a difference between "the feed itself" and "the set of all past, present and future articles in the feed" (which there certainly is in the general case) then you really have to accept e) as the only possibility for unknown metadata in the feed head section. Regards, Peter -- Peter Robinson <http://www.ticketswitch.com/>
