David, Looks like I picked a good time to catch up on Atom-syntax mail.
> Actually - can cf:list be used together with cf:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'true'?, Yes, it can. See the example in the explanatory doc we posted a while back. http://blogs.msdn.com/rssteam/articles/SimpleListExtensionsExplained.aspx That example feed is online here: http://sean.members.winisp.net/lists/bookexample.xml -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Powell Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:31 PM To: James Holderness Cc: atom-syntax Subject: Re: Atom Rank Extensions Tuesday, May 2, 2006, 10:06:51 PM, James Holderness wrote: > Just looking at that example, it seems to me that an aggregator that > implements Microsoft's simple list extensions would get a full-featured > representation of that feed without having to know anything at all about > feed rank and feed history. So why bother with them? I made a suggestion for avoiding implicit ordering in SLE on the FEED-TECH list[1]. Basically to allow the cf:treatAs to use the @element and @data-type attributes that are used in cf:sort and cf:group elements, so that entries could include a datestamp, or index, which could be used for the ordering of the list rather than the natural ordering. [1] http://discuss.microsoft.com/SCRIPTS/WA-MSD.EXE?A2=ind0603d&L=feed-tech&T=0&F=&S=&P=312 Actually - can cf:list be used together with cf:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'true'?, I think I'll ask... -- Dave