It sounds like you're asking about the protocol independent of how it is presented on the Web. In that case, I think it is fine to say that, e.g., SEARCH *can* be used RESTfully, but I don't think it is *necessarily* RESTful unless we know the rest of the application. My $.02. -enp On Nov 2, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
|
- Adding POST capability to atom:link Gopalan Sri
- Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Thomas Broyer
- Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link James M Snell
- Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Jan Algermissen
- Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Jan Algermissen
- Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Jan Algermissen
- RE: Adding POST capability to atom:link Gopalan Sri
- Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Jan Algermissen
- How to do RESTful SEARCH (was Re: Adding... Lisa Dusseault
- Re: How to do RESTful SEARCH (was R... Ernest Prabhakar
- Re: How to do RESTful SEARCH (was R... Jan Algermissen
- Re: How to do RESTful SEARCH (was R... Mark Baker
- Re: Adding POST capability to atom:link Thomas Broyer
- searches - was Re: Adding POST capability to atom:li... Henry Story
- Re: searches - was Re: Adding POST capability to... Jan Algermissen
- Re: searches - was Re: Adding POST capabilit... Henry Story