* Henry Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-02 16:55]: > The question is: how does this help any of us? It may look like > it is a "term", but what is a client meant to do with all this > information?
Simple: when the scheme and term of two different entries are identical, then you have confidence that they refer to the same concept. When the scheme URI is absent, the term is ambiguous. That’s what scheme and term mean, and that’s all that they mean. If you want to use a dereferencable protocol scheme for your category’s scheme URI, and want to run a service providing resources at the given URI, that’s fine, and more power to you. But nothing like that is mandated, much less is any approach for deriving a dereferencable URI for a single term. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
