Robert Sayre wrote: > > Don't move forward with the autodiscovery draft. [...] > At this point there seems to be no reason for the autodiscovery draft > to exist, since the WHAT-WG has ably covered the subject in Web > Applications 1.0.
I am worried that there are three simultaneous efforts to spec out feed autodiscovery: WA1, the RSS board's recent spec, and this draft. Ideally this stuff would get specced just once. WHAT WG seems like a neutral ground, syndication-format wise, so perhaps they're best positioned to spec feed autodiscovery in a way that makes everybody happy. Ted -- Edward O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem.
