--- Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some aspect of the WHAT-WG document that
> bothers you?

Not yet, aside from the notion that they've got an
incredibly ambitious goal -- spec the next
HTML/XHTML/DOM -- and I have no idea how to gauge the
likelihood they'll achieve it. Or whether they'll
respect current autodiscovery functionality in MSIE 7
and Firefox 2.0.

> Why not provide feedback there?

I will if that's where autodiscovery goes.

But I'm +1 on PaceMakeAutodiscoveryInformational.
Seems like a good idea to tell Atom publishers how to
support autodiscovered feeds.

Reply via email to