Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> writes: >> Now could there also be commands `TeX-update-region' and >> `LaTeX-update-section'? > > In `TeX-command-sequence' there is the line > > (TeX-command cmd 'TeX-master-file 0) > > so commands are always run on the whole document, but we can change > this by adding another argument to the function with the name of the > file to be compiled, for the region case. Also the `t' branch of the > first `cond' should be updated to cater for the region.
I just added an optional FILE-FN argument which can be either #'TeX-master-file or #'TeX-region-file. So now you can do (TeX-command-sequence t t #'TeX-region-file) to recompile the region. Well, what's missing is that the region file needs to be updated before doing that but I don't have time to do that. >> And while we are at it: do you think "update" is the best term for >> this feature? IMHO, it's a too wide term, e.g., anything can be >> updated and there's already `TeX-update-style' which has nothing to >> do with that feature. So maybe the terms "recompile" or just >> "compile" would fit better? > > I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I tend to agree with you. > I just followed the name suggested in our wishlist which also matches > the proposed key binding `C-c C-u'. Feel free to change the names > (and key binding), if you feel like that. Too bad the bindings for the only two better terms I can come up, i.e., _c_ompile and _r_ecompile, are already taken for _c_ommand and _r_egion... Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
