Hi Tassilo, 2015-09-04 6:56 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org>: > Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> writes: > >>>> Is `TeX-command-run-all' an option? Rational: `TeX-command-list' >>>> mostly uses `run'. +1 for C-c C-a. >>> >>> Uhm, good point but I really don't know which option to choose: for >>> me `TeX-command-compile-all' and `TeX-command-run-all' are equally >>> good. > > So now I've renamed TeX-update to TeX-command-run-all and bound it to > C-c C-a. The reason I didn't come up with "run all" in the first place > is that all TeX-run-* functions are internal workers, not commands. > Well, but `TeX-command-run-all' is fine of course.
Thanks! > Glad we have that now. Then I'll do the region/section stuff ASAP, Mosè > does the Index suggestion, and then we can have a new shiny release Cool! > (after a bit of testing)! I think we have accumulated more than enough > additions, fixes, and new features to think about that. Regarding testing. I think `LaTeX-command-run-all-section' should check if it's on a LaTeX document, for example in a plain tex document it currently throws the error LaTeX-command-run-all-section: Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil In addition, in this simple document --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- \documentclass{article} \begin{document} \section{one} \label{sec:one} hey there \section{two} \label{sec:two} -!-foo \end{document} %%% Local Variables: %%% mode: latex %%% TeX-master: t %%% End: --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- with point at -!- if I run C-u C-u C-c C-a compilation fails because _region_.tex doesn't exist, and when compiling with C-c C-z the content of the section (-!-foo) isn't included in the final output. Bye, Mosè _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel