2015-09-01 21:45 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org>: > Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> writes: > >>> Now could there also be commands `TeX-update-region' and >>> `LaTeX-update-section'? >> >> In `TeX-command-sequence' there is the line >> >> (TeX-command cmd 'TeX-master-file 0) >> >> so commands are always run on the whole document, but we can change >> this by adding another argument to the function with the name of the >> file to be compiled, for the region case. Also the `t' branch of the >> first `cond' should be updated to cater for the region. > > I just added an optional FILE-FN argument which can be either > #'TeX-master-file or #'TeX-region-file. So now you can do > > (TeX-command-sequence t t #'TeX-region-file) > > to recompile the region.
Thanks, that's what I was thinking to. > Well, what's missing is that the region file > needs to be updated before doing that but I don't have time to do that. Uhm, I'll try to have a look at this, but I don't know when. >>> And while we are at it: do you think "update" is the best term for >>> this feature? IMHO, it's a too wide term, e.g., anything can be >>> updated and there's already `TeX-update-style' which has nothing to >>> do with that feature. So maybe the terms "recompile" or just >>> "compile" would fit better? >> >> I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I tend to agree with you. >> I just followed the name suggested in our wishlist which also matches >> the proposed key binding `C-c C-u'. Feel free to change the names >> (and key binding), if you feel like that. > > Too bad the bindings for the only two better terms I can come up, i.e., > _c_ompile and _r_ecompile, are already taken for _c_ommand and > _r_egion... Indeed we're running out of letters. Letters still free should be: a (u) x y Actually I'm not sure about "x". Do you have ideas for "a" or "y"? Bye, Mosè _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel