> On Sep 1, 2015, at 2:47 PM, Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> wrote: > > 2015-09-01 21:45 GMT+02:00 Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org>: >> Mosè Giordano <m...@gnu.org> writes: >> >>>> And while we are at it: do you think "update" is the best term for >>>> this feature? IMHO, it's a too wide term, e.g., anything can be >>>> updated and there's already `TeX-update-style' which has nothing to >>>> do with that feature. So maybe the terms "recompile" or just >>>> "compile" would fit better? >>> >>> I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I tend to agree with you. >>> I just followed the name suggested in our wishlist which also matches >>> the proposed key binding `C-c C-u'. Feel free to change the names >>> (and key binding), if you feel like that. >> >> Too bad the bindings for the only two better terms I can come up, i.e., >> _c_ompile and _r_ecompile, are already taken for _c_ommand and >> _r_egion... > > Indeed we're running out of letters. Letters still free should be: > > a (u) x y > > Actually I'm not sure about "x". Do you have ideas for "a" or "y"?
How about "all" or "yo, do everything dude". :-) Actually I kind of like all, though TeX-all isn’t a great name for the function. -Ivan _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
