>>> "TH" == Tassilo Horn <t...@gnu.org> writes: > Hi all, > some weeks ago, Philip Kaludercic saw a commit of mine triggering a new > AUCTeX ELPA release and asked why there were changes to files which > shouldn't be committed because they are generated from other files, > e.g., info files.
> - There's also a completely different alternative: make the > externals/elpa the new "main" branch and drop master and tarball > releases altogether. Is there still a justification for having > them? I mean, we dropped XEmacs support anyway and it should be > easy enough for distros to just use the ELPA tarballs as basis for > their distro packages. Just to be sure. For any of these two proposals: It would be still possible to pull (fetch) and compile auctex independently of emacs? I am asking because gnus since some time is part of Emacs so upgrading gnus without upgrading emacs is not easy to say the least. Uwe Brauer -- I strongly condemn Hamas heinous despicable pogroms/atrocities on Israel I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against Ukraine. I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military. I support the EU and NATO membership of Ukraine.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature