P Floding;131013 Wrote: > Surely, asynchronous means the clocks aren't running in synchrony, which > would not have anything to do with sample rate conversion per se? (I > have read a fair bit about sample rate conversion.) > > I don't really see why a one-clock system should perform asynchronous > operations?
I'm going to make a guess here, so don't hold me to it...:-) ...but if you are changing the sample rate of the data, you will need two clocks, no? One clock runs at the original sample-rate (44.1khz) and the second runs at the new sample rate (96khz). This would perhaps not be true/necessary for oversampling at integer-multiples, but it would absolutely need to be true for upsampling at non-integer multiples, right? -- PhilNYC Sonic Spirits Inc. http://www.sonicspirits.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PhilNYC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=837 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26685 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
