Pat Farrell;131023 Wrote: > PhilNYC wrote:[color=blue] > > or one that runs at 44.1*48 and select the proper signal samples > off a common clock. > > There was a time when 44.1kHz was a challenge. > By the time SACD came out, 2.82 MHz was not a challenge. > At least if you are not trying to use a Tube clock :-) > > So having one clock is not a big deal. > But changing from 44.1 to 48 or 96 is a really bad idea, IMHO. >
I agree that converting 44.1 to 48 is a bad idea. But at least going from 44.1 to 96 allows you to achieve some of the "moving artifacts to a higher frequency" so that filtering those artifacts out. But I agree that it appears to be much smarter to simply do a full-integer oversample. -- PhilNYC Sonic Spirits Inc. http://www.sonicspirits.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PhilNYC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=837 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26685 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
