P Floding;153348 Wrote: > > There is no "pretty much" rejection -either source jitter is rejected > or it isn't.
When you can tell me what PSRR stands for, I'll get back into this conversation (maybe). Until then, you can parse the words any way you want. It doesn't change the bottom line, which is that using AD1896 is one of the best methods for jitter attenuation (o.k.?) short of synching clocks to the transport. This is just a fact, and there is no need to belabor the point further. -- ezkcdude DIY projects page: http://www.ezdiyaudio.com System: SB3->EZDAC->MIT Terminator 2 interconnects->Endler Audio 24-step Attenuators (RCA-direct)->Parasound Halo A23 125W/ch amplifier->Speltz anti-cables->DIY 2-ways + Dayton Titanic 10" subwoofer He's not hi-fi, he's my stereo. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ezkcdude's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2545 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29450 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
