ezkcdude;153406 Wrote: > You may be reading, but you are not understanding, or you're just being > stubborn. My point about PSRR is that rejection does not have to be all > or nothing. It can be quantified. AD1896 rejects practically all of the > jitter on the input. Yes, you can always argue that it's not complete > rejection. That is correct, but it's just so misleading to say it > "embeds jitter in the output signal". That makes it sound as if it is > done intentionally. Maybe that is what you think, I don't know. > > What really bothers me is that the "truthiness" of your comments are > likely (nay, typically) enough to convince ~90% of wannabe audiophiles > to spend thousands of unecessary dollars.
Rejection RATIO is, of course, something different to "rejects". It's a numer. Doesn't imply infinite rejection, at all. On the contrary. Embedding of jitter is not done intentionally, neither is it something I have invented. It is, claims those who know a lot, a side effect of asynchronous sample rate conversion. ASRC is in effect a digital implementation of a D/A->A/D step. Such as step will pass jitter artifacts through, as you can imagine. -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29450 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
