Skunk;175739 Wrote: > You might want to check your facts :-) > > http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/ > > edit: link failed to go 'technology' page. See first two sentences. There's no arguing with what Andre has written on his web site.
So how come discs which are known to be free of C2 errors rip considerably faster when the C2 option is checked than when it isn't? This suggests to me that the sectors are being read fewer times. Perhaps it reads twice when C2 is checked, and even more times if it's not? But I can't really fathom why it should ever bother to re-read if the drive can be trusted to tell it if there's been a C2 error. -- cliveb Performers -> dozens of mixers and effects -> clipped/hypercompressed mastering -> you think a few extra ps of jitter matters? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32212 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
