pablolie;184215 Wrote: > I hear your pain given recent events around a question I asked! :-) But > if you read between the lines, I think the answer is Toslink is not > flawed. The same interface works in applications demanding high > resiliency, is all I can say. I don't think anything's flwaed about the > interface - any weaknessses have to be attributed to the application > running on top...
Interesting, my understanding is quite opposite... Eric mentioned that consumer Toslink does have higher jitter, but because of his assumption we can't perceive jitter less then ridiculously high :) +-0.5ns (that were nanoseconds, right?) he expressed his little concern about that. I've already said what I think about inaudibility assumptions. I'm somewhat concerned with that massive feedbacks that people don't like Toslink, we may define it BS, but I'm not sure those complains are totally baseless... So I'm Googling to find out... -- 325xi simaudio nova cdp >> simaudio moon i-5 >> revel performa m20 via acoustic zen matrix reference ii and acoustic zen satori -planned additions:... >> deq2496 >> lavry da-10 >>...- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 325xi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5661 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33146 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
