ezkcdude;230412 Wrote: > I think what acoustic wants, and he can correct me, is a Transporter > with out the "er". IOW, a Transporter minus the output stage. I would > also be interested in such a component, perhaps, with only a single > display. If that came in around $1000, I'm sure there would be plenty > of folks who would want one.[/b] > > I got that impression reading posts, here and initially on German > forums (people being quite high on the Squeezebox there, but everyone > modifying it one way or the other, which is why I ended up posting > here). > > http://www.empiricalaudio.com/frPace-Car.html#Squeezebox Application
ezkcdude;230412 Wrote: > There is quite a bit of "in between" between the SB3 and the > Transporter. That appears to be the general consensus. ezkcdude;230412 Wrote: > BTW, ACOUSTIC, IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY, I BELIEVE YOU MAY WANT TO LOOK AT > A PRODUCT CALLED THE PACE-CAR. IT'S A MOD THAT CAN BE DONE FOR THE SB3 > THAT ADDS A WORD CLOCK INPUT: > > http://www.empiricalaudio.com/frPace-Car.html#Squeezebox Application Already had a look at that. That thing basically *is* an external masterclock with word clock outputs. That is, the wordclock signal will be handed forward, the DAC slaved to it, not vice versa. That's superfluous and/or overkill if you have a DAC with wordclock in- and output (the Pacecar probably being most interesting to people who insist on I2S). In all this, don't forget: it's on/next to the DAC board that the WC should be placed (physically!). Greetings from Switzerland, David. -- acousticsguru ------------------------------------------------------------------------ acousticsguru's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13298 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38637 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
