ezkcdude;230412 Wrote: > I think what acoustic wants, and he can correct me, is a Transporter > with out the "er". IOW, a Transporter minus the output stage. I would > also be interested in such a component, perhaps, with only a single > display. If that came in around $1000, I'm sure there would be plenty > of folks who would want one.
I got that impression reading posts, here of course, though initially on German forums (people being quite high on the Squeezebox there, but everyone modifying it one way or the other, which is why I ended up posting here). ezkcdude;230412 Wrote: > There is quite a bit of "in between" between the SB3 and the > Transporter. That appears to be the general consensus. ezkcdude;230412 Wrote: > BTW, ACOUSTIC, IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY, I BELIEVE YOU MAY WANT TO LOOK AT > A PRODUCT CALLED THE PACE-CAR. IT'S A MOD THAT CAN BE DONE FOR THE SB3 > THAT ADDS A WORD CLOCK INPUT: > > http://www.empiricalaudio.com/frPace-Car.html#Squeezebox Application Already had a look at that. That thing basically *is* an external masterclock with word clock outputs. That is, the wordclock signal will be handed forward, the DAC slaved to it, not vice versa. That's superfluous and/or overkill if you have a DAC with wordclock in- and output (the Pacecar probably being most interesting to people who insist on I2S). In all this, don't forget: it's on/next to the DAC board that the WC should be placed (physically!). Greetings from Switzerland, David. -- acousticsguru ------------------------------------------------------------------------ acousticsguru's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13298 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38637 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
