earwaxer9;615059 Wrote: > ... As far as "eq" is concerned - no self respecting audiophile would > EVER engage in such a thing. I dont care if its analog or digital. It > wasnt good in the 70's and its not good now. Just because its call > "digital" doesnt make it ok. Get your gear together and you wont have > to mess with the frequencies - except of course for the sub-woofer, but > then only from about 20-60hz.
There's nothing wrong with your opinion but please don't state it as fact because it isn't. No amount of "getting your gear together" will result in a flattish frequency response in normal homes, especially below 500Hz. Digital EQ is nothing like analogue. Nothing. Also, every self respecting "audiophile" indulges in EQ when they buy any piece of equipment :-) -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF x-dacv3/x-10/x-psu(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Belden Digital,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables Stax4070+SRM7/II phones Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85922 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
