aubuti;684603 Wrote: > Maybe there's a typo or something, but now I'm puzzled about the results > of your test. In post #6 of this thread you said -"In my system, even a > better (Monster, $15) cat6 Ethernet cable did cause a significant SQ > improvement. I know, tough to believe, but that has been my > experience."- > > But in the post from last November that you just cited you said -"At > this point it's really immaterial which of the two sounds "better," but > for the record it's NOT the Monster."-
True. At that point it WAS immaterial. Later, however, as I changed my subwoofer's settings, it became clear that the cat6 Monster was indeed the better choice. More (and tighter) bass, more open sound, better timbres, etc. Again, my main point is that Ethernet cables MAY yield some audible differences. Which is best, if any, depends, I think, on a variety of factors related to one's system. Guido F. -- guidof MUSIC ROOM: Marantz TT 15S1 Turntable, Virtuoso Wood Cartridge->Conrad Johnson Motif preamp Oppo BDP-83 Universal Player->Cambridge Azur 840C DAC Vortexbox Appliance->WiFi Bridge->Squeezebox Touch->Toslink->Cambridge Azur 840C DAC->Adcom GFP-750 preamp->Music Reference RM-200 Mk II amp -> Martin Logan SL3s DSpeaker Antimode 8033->REL T1 Sub BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch (analog out)->Little Dot Mk III amp->AKG K701 headphones SECOND BEDROOM: Squeezebox Touch->Grado SR125 headphones ------------------------------------------------------------------------ guidof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40448 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=92924 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
