Ok, I wasn't a big believer in the TAS "sell them anything" conspiracy theory. But just got #222. There were two letters to the editor printed about the four part story, but both asking for advice on whether they should re-rip their FLAC files.
So no questions published about Dr Charles Zellig and Jay Clawson's credentials. No questions published questioning if two ripping programs produce bit identical files, how can there be a difference due to the ripping programs. No acknowledgement of the controversy on many forums, or Stereophile's comment that they had been offered the series, had concerns, and passed on printing the series. I have a few issues left on my subscription, but if editorially they just ignore all this, looks like I'll not be renewing after many years. eric -- EricBergan ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EricBergan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4746 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93549 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
