heisenberg wrote: > Very good points. I don't think the debate is about the veracity of the > source information (like you've said, in digital world, a copy is 100% > identical to the original). So this copy can be tossed over and bounced > back-and-forth through countless channels till the cows come home, still > in the end it remains 100% faithful to its original. > > Where the differences may arise is at the point where a digital copy > gets RENDERED as an analog artifact. Two identical jpeg files WILL look > strikingly (and sometimes shockingly) different on two differently > calibrated monitors. That fact is very easy to demonstrate. > > Same applies to the rendition of the digitized music files. Differently > calibrated players will render the same and identical digital file > differently. Also easy to demonstrate to anyone with reasonably reliable > hearing skills.
The fallacy of comparing the digital picture files example to issues with digital music files has been previously discussed at these forums (been a few years I believe, but a search should find some of the threads...) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98249 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
