jkeny wrote: 
> Right, I was just wondering how all those who claim the transparency of
> current DACs would reconcile their position if they listened to the
> Regen? Of course, refusing to listen to such a device will save their
> embarrassment. But some such objectivists have the 'courage to listen'
> (http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f8-general-forum/gordon-rankin-says-im-wrong-about-universal-serial-bus-industry-standard-cables-connectors-and-communications-protocols-between-computers-and-electronic-devices-cable-sound-20814/index41.html#post444529)
> 
> 
> Instead of demanding DBTs &/or measurements, I find this a much more
> honest position.

This suggests that you (as well as the post's author) are in total
denial vis-a-vis the well known shortcomings of the means of evaluation
that the author of this post no doubt used:
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f8-general-forum/gordon-rankin-says-im-wrong-about-universal-serial-bus-industry-standard-cables-connectors-and-communications-protocols-between-computers-and-electronic-devices-cable-sound-20814/index41.html#post444529

Please explain how total denial of well known and generally accepted
facts is consonant with honesty.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
arnyk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=64365
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to