jkeny wrote: > Right, I was just wondering how all those who claim the transparency of > current DACs would reconcile their position if they listened to the > Regen? Of course, refusing to listen to such a device will save their > embarrassment. But some such objectivists have the 'courage to listen' > (http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f8-general-forum/gordon-rankin-says-im-wrong-about-universal-serial-bus-industry-standard-cables-connectors-and-communications-protocols-between-computers-and-electronic-devices-cable-sound-20814/index41.html#post444529) >
As previously stated, the burden of proof is on the manufacturer since they are making the claim. Basic philosophy. jkeny wrote: > Instead of demanding DBTs &/or measurements, I find this a much more > honest position. Not a shread of proof to found. Opinions, yes. Tangible, no. Best Regards, Gandhi not often enough well recorded and mastered cds *|* dbpoweramp with accuraterip *|* flac *|* fanless asrock z77e-itx intel i5-3570t *|* ubuntu 12.04.1 lts 32-bit *|* lms 7.8.0 *|* brutefirdrc 3.0 (rewv5) *|* transporter (balanced out) *|* thule ia252b *|* audio physic scorpio *|* no fancy cables. *+* also some booms. *+* harmony 525s for them all, including waking the server from s3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gandhi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58909 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103842 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
