Julf wrote: > Yes, that is a possibility. But my point is that there is nothing really > mysterious (or anything that breaks current scientific understanding) > about it. > > > > Absolutely. The problem is that audiophiles have used that paper to > argue that Nyquist-Shannon doesn't apply - but they are also the ones > arguing that a sampled signal supposedly can't represent time > differences smaller than one sample interval...
I hear that. I took it to imply that there *-might-* be an advantage going further than 16/44.1, although Nyquist-Shannon would still apply. If the recordings had genuine provenance, of course... Dave :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Golden Earring's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=66646 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106519 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
