On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman <sc...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 20 December 2013 01:11, Karol Blazewicz <karol.blazew...@gmail.com> wrote: >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rstudio/ is something entirely >> different than every other 'rstudio' package >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?&K=rstudio >> A few users suggested name change. > > I was fooled for a second. I thought this was just another R Studio.
I'm guilty of not reading the package description too: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1361971#p1361971 >> Can we force the maintainer to change package name? Does the package >> have to be properly disowned and reuploaded with a different name? > > Yeah, they have to conform to existing naming schemes. I say rename it > to r-studio, though that doesn't really look that much more helpful. I can e-mail the maintainer and we can wait the customary 2 weeks, but what exactly should I tell him? He did provide a description, so maybe uploading an r-studio package using the PKGBUILD provided by gbc921 would be enough? > > > -- > GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1