while I'd very much prefer you concentrating on something more meaningful
than hiding (because thanks to I do not know who we dont really delete
anything), (almost all fixable) packages from a list, like fixing compilers,
testing the recipes on exotic platforms and commenting on that tech upgrade
which yesterday may have seemed you too far a shot but today should seem
to you way more reasonable, nor I am the person who reported you nor the
one who suspended your account
still its clear you use a program to get your out of dates and i suppose
not all maintainers like to literally chat with you through out-of-date
notifs
like you send me out of date for packages about programs I am the author
of minutes after I release them and I have proof at times you don't check
the release is working yourself before the report
also your deletion request put a lot of stress on people
I mean, when I will have come back to a normality of sorts I will have to
re-read all 2023 aur emails just to check you didn't manage to delete significant
programs I use in between small libraries without a much discussion, like
when you hid Banshee
in general is stressing dealing with somebody who prefers to hide what (to
him) it doesn't work instead of fixing it directly
as a comparison, I immensely prefer having a mips gcc3 broken recipe than
not having it at all, because if I don't have it I wont remember or know
at all the mips compiler exists and it is broken
