What about the devices the Kiwis use to go through electric fences? I've seen 
one on a Std Cirrus, the pilot said he'd needed it twice. It was a small device 
on top of the nose designed to catch wire and cut it. 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Sent: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] RE: Another fatality


Yes in the Netherlands i is compulsory due to very small paddock size. 
 
 
On 27/02/2007, at 7:41 AM, Derek Ruddock wrote: 
 
> I believe it has been mandatory for a number of years in one European 
> county (Holland?) to have wire strike protectors fitted. 
> These look like mini roll cages, with wire breakers, and fit inside > the 
> canopy 
> I remember seeing a glider in Australia (Paul Matthews?) flying > with one 
> some years ago 
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:aus-soaring- 
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parncutt 
>> Sent: Monday, 26 February 2007 11:10 PM 
>> To: 'Peter Creswick'; 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in 
> Australia.' 
>> Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] RE: Another fatality 
>> 
>> Yes I agree that wirecutters as installed on Pawnee's for instance 
> would 
>> offer a significant safety improvement, but it is the glider 
> manufacturers 
>> that would need to be persuaded to incorporate this in their designs. 
>> "Good Luck"! 
>> 
>> In the mean time it would not be unreasonable to look at fence 
> designs, if 
>> only at the relatively short sections at the ends of the runway where 
> the 
>> majority of these incidents are likely to happen. 
>> 
>> Bear in mind that it is often the gliding clubs that end up 
> maintaining 
>> these sections of fencing anyway, since its their tugs that probably 
> cause 
>> the most wear and tear! 
>> 
>> John Parncutt 
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- 
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> Peter 
>> Creswick 
>> Sent: Monday, 26 February 2007 10:31 PM 
>> To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
>> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] RE: Another fatality 
>> 
>> And who is going to design them, install them, pay for them, maintain 
> them ? 
>> 
>> What if the farmer / whoever refuses ? Are you going to force the 
> issue 
>> legally and have them "mandated" somehow ? 
>> Good luck. 
>> Even if you did, what about the case of an outlanding, with an old, 
> hidden, 
>> partial fence, with a few strands, in the middle of a field, in the 
> middle 
>> of nowhere ? 
>> It is the glider that has to be equipped to deal with the wire, not 
> the wire 
>> being equipped / configured to deal with the glider. 
>> What is required is a wire cutter arrangement like cropdusters have, 
> which 
>> would be far - far better. They have been needed for years, but 
> everyone 
>> refuses to consider them. Why ? 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "John Parncutt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>> To: "'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.'" 
>> <aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net> 
>> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 9:19 PM 
>> Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] RE: Another fatality 
>> 
>> 
>>> Given the amount of incidents which have occurred with aerodrome 
> perimeter 
>>> fences especially in gliding, perhaps thought should be given to 
> changing 
>>> the design of these fences to make them more forgiving. 
>>> 
>>> Possibilities may include some sort of weak link system in each wire 
> or 
>>> perhaps sprung sections which may allow the canopy to deflect the 
> wire. 
>>> 
>>> I'm sure there is enough ingenuity within the gliding movement to 
> come up 
>>> with some ideas to make these fences safer whilst still performing 
> their 
>>> function. 
>>> 
>>> John Parncutt 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message----- 
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Bruce 
>>> Taylor 
>>> Sent: Monday, 26 February 2007 8:24 PM 
>>> To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. 
>>> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] RE: Another fatality 
>>> 
>>> Good call, Mitch. 
>>> 
>>> The only addition I would like to make is that it seems the 
>>> pilot/instructor 
>>> had very few options... he was released at low altitude without 
> enough 
>>> energy to clear the fence, and (thinking through the evidence I have 
>>> heard) 
>>> with a downburst happening somewhere behind him. This leaves him 
> with an 
>>> increasing tailwind, and if he was touching down somewhere near the 
> stall, 
>>> he is approaching the fence with no control response, in a 
>>> nosewheel-equipped glider. He DID try to groundloop, with no 
> response. 
>>> 
>>> Very tough for all, especially the instructor. 
>>> 
>>> BT. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Mitchell Preston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>>> To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia." 
>>> <aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net> 
>>> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 6:48 PM 
>>> Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] RE: Another fatality 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Fair comment, Ron, however in this case we should perhaps refrain 
> from 
>>>> any judgement (deliberate or otherwise) until a more suitable 
> time. I 
>>>> would like to offer my condolences to the family of the student 
> and let 
>>>> my good friends at LKSC know that they are in my thoughts as they 
> deal 
>>>> with the aftermath of this accident. 
>>>> 
>>>> Mitch. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 25/02/2007, at 9:05 PM, Ron Sanders wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>>> Even if you have only got five feet to run before the fence YOU 
> MUST 
>>>>> initiate a ground loop. 
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>> Aus-soaring mailing list 
>>>> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
>>>> To check or change subscription details, visit: 
>>>> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> Aus-soaring mailing list 
>>> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
>>> To check or change subscription details, visit: 
>>> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> Aus-soaring mailing list 
>>> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
>>> To check or change subscription details, visit: 
>>> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> No virus found in this incoming message. 
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
>>> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/702 - Release Date: 
> 25/02/2007 
>> 
>>> 3:16 PM 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> Aus-soaring mailing list 
>> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
>> To check or change subscription details, visit: 
>> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> Aus-soaring mailing list 
>> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
>> To check or change subscription details, visit: 
>> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Aus-soaring mailing list 
> Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
> To check or change subscription details, visit: 
> http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
 
_______________________________________________ 
Aus-soaring mailing list 
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net 
To check or change subscription details, visit: 
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring 
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and security 
tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free 
AOL Mail and more.
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to