Ask the guys who've had to strip and refinish a Vorgelat K21. If you think the Blanik was horrible to fly you must have flown a badly rigged example ( possible, given some of the rocket scientists maintaining gliders in Australia) or your perception of flying qualities is somewhat off. OK the comfort of the front seat is nothing to write home about ( my theory is that the seat tester later got a job at GMH, walks in a crouch, has long arms and shaggy hair all over).
Mike > On 22 Dec 2014, at 8:02 pm, Derek Ruddock <drudd...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > > Our IS 28’s were a nightmare to maintain and regularly went out of service > for maintenance or due to unavailability of spare parts. > The K21’s by contrast are a delight: the only downtime has been for regular > and brief servicing. > One thing the IS28’s were good at is for the teaching of spins. > Derek > 205 flights and 86 hours in K21’s > 666 flights and 300 hours in IS 28’s > 1 flight and 0.7 hours in a Blanik: I reckon that was about 0.7 hours too > long J > > From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net > [mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of Leigh Bunting > Sent: Monday, 22 December 2014 9:59 PM > To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net > Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] IS-28B CQC's last flying day: > > Gee Mike, > > I can see that you have never had to work on these "eastern-bloc" metal > gliders. I consider that they were a Communist plot to send western glider > pilots mad. > > I spent 30 years working on Blaniks and they were a nightmare to keep tight. > Forever replacing control circuit bearings for one thing. I understand that > IS28's are similar. I have many, many more hours tearings Blaniks apart and > putting them back together than sitting in the cockpit, even though a Blanik > is quite nice to fly. The only thing in a Blanik I never took apart was the > oleo strut. > > Back in the days Mike Burns was CTO, I said to him that I could ground every > Blanik in Australia because one AD required measuring spar pin holes to > 3-decimal places with tolerances to 4 IIRC. I had access to metrology > equipment that could measure those numbers. Our Blaniks were out of spec then > and I imagine no used Blanik then or now would comply - if that joke of an AD > is still applicable. > > After we sold our last Blanik, I followed the new owner down to the airfield > gate and locked it behind him so he couldn't get back in if he changed his > mind. Then I went to the RTO/A and had all my metal ratings removed, so now I > cannot even DI a tin can. > > These things were never meant to last as long as we have had them. Especially > in our dusty climate. In the Communist countries, I'm led to believe that > they replaced them regularly. I'm sure they never slaved over them like we > have. There are even odd individuals who LIKE working on the things. These > people are very 'special' to be politically correct. > > Having flown an IS28 once, I find your comparison to an ASK21 puzzling. Maybe > on paper, but certainly not in practice. I found that you could thermal the > thing with negative flap and it didn't appear to make any difference to > positive flap. It's front pole was even longer than a Blanik's. I seem to > remember feeling like having to look around my hand to see ahead. Anyway, the > IS28 is nowhere near as pleasant as an ASK21. At least in a Blanik, I could > thermal with full flap, elevator and trim against the back stops and 25kts or > less on the dial. > > Let us know how many hours you have flying a Blanik, IS28 and ASK21 and I'll > dig out mine so we can compare experience. > > Cheers and happy xmas, > Leigh Bunting > > On 22/12/14 15:08, Mike Borgelt wrote: > Shameful is what it is. It is well known that metal aircraft have two > problems when they age: > Fatigue and corrosion, both of which can be inspected for and rectified if > required. > Now it may not be economical to do the rectification but that can depend on > the particular circumstances of the owner. > Nothing to do with calendar life at all and an IS28 is hardly obsolete for > the purposes for which it is flown. As I have noted before, an ASK21 is > essentially a fibreglass IS 28. Look them up in Martin Simon's book on > sailplanes 1965 to 2000. > What a pity we don't have in this country an organisation dedicated to > promoting the interests of glider pilots and glider owners. > > _______________________________________________ > Aus-soaring mailing list > Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net > To check or change subscription details, visit: > http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
_______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list Aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net To check or change subscription details, visit: http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
