*New PJCIS Public Hearings* *16 Nov 2018:* Sydney, NSW *30 Nov 2018:* Canberra, ACT
https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/TelcoAmendmentBill2018 On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 13:23, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone yet had the opportunity to think through the use of force > provisions? Does use of force extend beyond physical forced entry, to say, > hacking? > > Kind regards > Paul Wilkins > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 18:03, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Compare: >> >> CHAIR: So the big companies like Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, over-the-top >> messaging services like Signal and WhatsApp? >> Mr Hansford: A range of different industry companies. >> CHAIR: *A good percentage of those?* >> Mr Hansford: *A reasonable percentage, I'd say.* >> (Public) FRIDAY, 19 OCTOBER 2018 >> >> "The government has consulted *extensively* with industry and the public >> on these measuresand has made amendments to reflect the feedback in the >> legislation now before the parliament." >> Minister for Home Affairs - Speech to Parliament 20 Sept 2018 >> >> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 16:01, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> DIGI's submission (Amazon, Facebook, Google, Oath, and Twitter) has just >>> appeared: >>> >>> >>> https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=d48c3c35-221d-4544-a7d7-109a82c72dc1&subId=661549 >>> >>> On August 14, 2018, the Government released for Public Exposure a draft >>> of the Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and >>> Access) Bill 2018 (the “Bill”) together with an Exposure Document, to which >>> DIGI made a submission (attached). A revised Bill was introduced to >>> Parliament ten days following the close of submissions, with only minor >>> amendments that fail to address its potential impacts on public safety, >>> cybersecurity, privacy and human rights, raising concern among industry, >>> consumer and civil society groups. >>> >>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 11:30, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The PJCHR express extensive concerns with the bill. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Committees/Senate/committee/humanrights_ctte/reports/2018/Report%2011/c01.pdf?la=en >>>> >>>> The following demonstrates a posture where they will likely oppose the >>>> bill without further safeguards: >>>> >>>> 1.109 Another relevant factor in assessing whether a measure is >>>> proportionate is whether there is the possibility of oversight and the >>>> availability of review. The power to give a technical assistance notice or >>>> request, or technical capability notice, is not exercised by a judge, nor >>>> does a judge supervise its application. Section 317ZFA provides a >>>> discretionary power to a court, in relation to proceedings before it, to >>>> make such orders as the court considers appropriate in relation to the >>>> disclosure, protection, storage, handling or destruction of technical >>>> assistance information, if the court is satisfied that it is in the public >>>> interest. The bill does not otherwise provide for court involvement in the >>>> process of giving a technical assistance notice or request, or technical >>>> capability notice. The bill additionally seeks to amend the Administrative >>>> Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (ADJR Act) to exclude decisions under >>>> Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act (which would include a decision to >>>> issue a technical assistance notice or request, or technical capability >>>> notice) from judicial review under the ADJR Act. 47 In these circumstances, >>>> further information from the minister as the adequacy of the safeguards in >>>> terms of oversight and review would assist in determining the >>>> proportionality of the measures. >>>> >>>> Kind regards >>>> Paul Wilkins >>>> >>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 15:12, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> 21 October AEC had received 6890 postal votes out of 12,788 issued. >>>>> Today, received postal votes is 7,789. Sharma is trailing by 1,552. So I'm >>>>> calling it a Phelps' win and we will have minority government. >>>>> >>>>> Phelps will win by at least 500 votes so no recount. >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards >>>>> Paul Wilkins >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 18:19, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Transcript of public hearing 19th October: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22committees%2Fcommjnt%2F2a1771c8-f314-43f2-b9b0-cd09ad8123ae%2F0000%22 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 16:46, Christian Heinrich < >>>>>> christian.heinr...@cmlh.id.au> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:12 PM Paul Wilkins < >>>>>>> paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> > Except that where subject to an order under 317j to conceal the >>>>>>> existence of a TCN/TAN forms part of the terms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For PCI-DSS Requirement 4 Telstra [as an example I don't recommend] >>>>>>> have mandated that their customer is responsible for both the >>>>>>> infrastructure and software [as a service] within >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.telstra.com.au/content/dam/tcom/personal/consumer-advice/pdf/business-a-full/cloud-h.pdf >>>>>>> and are therefore unable to assist with the implementation of the >>>>>>> TCN/TAN. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Christian Heinrich >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://cmlh.id.au/contact >>>>>>> >>>>>>
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
