The PJCHR express extensive concerns with the bill. https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Committees/Senate/committee/humanrights_ctte/reports/2018/Report%2011/c01.pdf?la=en
The following demonstrates a posture where they will likely oppose the bill without further safeguards: 1.109 Another relevant factor in assessing whether a measure is proportionate is whether there is the possibility of oversight and the availability of review. The power to give a technical assistance notice or request, or technical capability notice, is not exercised by a judge, nor does a judge supervise its application. Section 317ZFA provides a discretionary power to a court, in relation to proceedings before it, to make such orders as the court considers appropriate in relation to the disclosure, protection, storage, handling or destruction of technical assistance information, if the court is satisfied that it is in the public interest. The bill does not otherwise provide for court involvement in the process of giving a technical assistance notice or request, or technical capability notice. The bill additionally seeks to amend the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (ADJR Act) to exclude decisions under Part 15 of the Telecommunications Act (which would include a decision to issue a technical assistance notice or request, or technical capability notice) from judicial review under the ADJR Act. 47 In these circumstances, further information from the minister as the adequacy of the safeguards in terms of oversight and review would assist in determining the proportionality of the measures. Kind regards Paul Wilkins On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 at 15:12, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> wrote: > 21 October AEC had received 6890 postal votes out of 12,788 issued. Today, > received postal votes is 7,789. Sharma is trailing by 1,552. So I'm calling > it a Phelps' win and we will have minority government. > > Phelps will win by at least 500 votes so no recount. > > Kind regards > Paul Wilkins > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 18:19, Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Transcript of public hearing 19th October: >> >> >> https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22committees%2Fcommjnt%2F2a1771c8-f314-43f2-b9b0-cd09ad8123ae%2F0000%22 >> >> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 16:46, Christian Heinrich < >> christian.heinr...@cmlh.id.au> wrote: >> >>> Paul, >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:12 PM Paul Wilkins <paulwilkins...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Except that where subject to an order under 317j to conceal the >>> existence of a TCN/TAN forms part of the terms. >>> >>> For PCI-DSS Requirement 4 Telstra [as an example I don't recommend] >>> have mandated that their customer is responsible for both the >>> infrastructure and software [as a service] within >>> >>> https://www.telstra.com.au/content/dam/tcom/personal/consumer-advice/pdf/business-a-full/cloud-h.pdf >>> and are therefore unable to assist with the implementation of the >>> TCN/TAN. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Christian Heinrich >>> >>> http://cmlh.id.au/contact >>> >>
_______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog