Carlos, Alex,
Thank you for your replies; we have updated the document accordingly (URLs
below). A few follow-ups:
1) Section 1.1: The new text provided does not cite [Telefonica2020], so this
reference has been removed. Please let us know if you prefer otherwise.
2) Section 6.1 re:
> [CMP] "there are opportunities to identify the most suitable location for
> functionality in the network” is the best one yet.
> [CMP] But we can discuss and re-confirm.
Do you prefer A or B or otherwise?
A) Current:
Likewise, there are opportunities to correctly place functionality in
the network for optimal effectiveness.
B) Perhaps:
Likewise, there are opportunities to identify the most suitable location
for functionality in the network.
3) Header: re:
> [CMP] Top-page: “NC State University & Blue Fern Consulting” or “NC State
> University / Blue Fern Consulting"
> [CMP] Authos’ Addresses: “North Carolina State University & Blue Fern
> Consulting”
The abbreviated organization appears long for the text file, i.e., it
horizontally overlaps with the left side. Do you prefer to leave it or change
to "NCSU & Blue Fern Consulting" or otherwise?
[best viewed with fixed-width font]
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) A. Clemm, Ed.
Request for Comments: 9845 Independent
Category: Informational C. Pignataro, Ed.
ISSN: 2070-1721 NC State University & Blue Fern Consulting
C. Westphal
[...]
The revised files are here (please refresh):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9845.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9845.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9845.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9845.xml
This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9845-diff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9845-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9845-auth48diff.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9845-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side)
This diff file shows only the changes since the last posted version:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9845-lastrfcdiff.html
We will wait to hear from you again and from your coauthors
before continuing the publication process. This page shows
the AUTH48 status of your document:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9845
Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar
> On Aug 28, 2025, at 8:12 PM, Carlos Pignataro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi, Sandy,
>
> Please find the final outcome of the text for Issue #35:
>
> OLD:
> For example, in its annual report, Telefónica reports that in 2021, its
> network’s energy consumption per petabyte (PB) of data amounted to 54
> megawatt-hours (MWh) [Telefonica2021]. This rate has been dramatically
> decreasing (by a factor of seven over six years), although gains in
> efficiency are being offset by simultaneous growth in data volume. The same
> report states that an important corporate goal is continuing on that
> trajectory and aggressively reducing overall carbon emissions further.
>
> NEW:
> For example, in its annual report, Telefónica states that in 2024, its
> network’s energy consumption per petabyte (PB) of data amounted to 38
> megawatt-hours (MWh) [Telefonica2024]. This represents an improvement of
> about 90% since the 2015 base year (400 MWh/PB), achieved through steady
> year-on-year efficiency gains, although these are still partly offset by
> simultaneous growth in data volume. The same report highlights an important
> corporate goal: continuing on this trajectory and further reducing overall
> greenhouse gas emissions.
>
> OLD:
> [Telefonica2021]
> Telefonica, "Telefonica Consolidated Annual Report 2021",
> 2021.
>
> NEW:
> [Telefonica2024]
> Telefonica, "Telefonica Consolidated Annual Report 2024",
>
> https://www.telefonica.com/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2025/02/Consolidated-Annual-Accounts-2024.pdf,
> 2024.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Carlos.
>
>> On Aug 28, 2025, at 10:42 PM, Carlos Pignataro <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>> 35) <!-- [rfced] We found the following URL for [Telefonica2021];
>>>> would you like to add it or a different URL to this reference?
>>>>
>>>> https://www.telefonica.com/en/shareholders-investors/financial-reports/historical-archive-annual-reports/2021/
>>>>
>>>> Current:
>>>> [Telefonica2021]
>>>> Telefonica, "Telefonica Consolidated Annual Report 2021",
>>>> 2021.
>>>> -->
>>>>
>>>> <ALEX>
>>>> Actual, we would like to point to the most recent report, which is 2024:
>>>> https://www.telefonica.com/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2025/03/consolidated-management-report.pdf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <Carlos>Actually, I disagree here. It is important to point to an earlier
>>>> / the FIRST time the Telefónica Annual Report included this. We can *also*
>>>> include 2024, but can we please revert back to including 2021 as well?
>>>> Thanks!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The number we are referencing from the report (which can be found now on
>>>> page 99) has changed. As a result, the following should be changed in the
>>>> text:
>>>> Original:
>>>> For example, in its annual report, Telefónica reports that in 2021, its
>>>> network's energy consumption per PB of data amounted to 54MWh
>>>> [Telefonica2021].
>>>>
>>>> New:
>>>> For example, in its annual report, Telefónica reports that in 2024, its
>>>> network's energy consumption per PB of data amounted to 38 MWh
>>>> [Telefonica2021].
>>>>
>>>> </ALEX>
>>>
>>> [rfced] Please let us know the outcome of this discussion.
>>>
>>
>
--
auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
